| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | HOW TO CITE ABSTRACTS | ARCHIVE | CME INFORMATION | SEARCH |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic research, epigenetics, immunology, non-coding RNAs, tumor microenvironment, metastasis, target identification, validation, lead discovery, and optimization: Poster Presentations - Proffered Abstracts |
Precision Therapeutics, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA
Abstract
Background: The epidermal growth factor pathway is an important driver of cancer growth. Erlotinib is a small molecule protein-kinase inhibitor targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that may benefit a select subtype of cancer patients. However, identification of the characteristics of patients who may benefit from the use of erlotinib is not easy. Previous publication explored the activation of signal transduction proteins in the EGFR pathway as a method of determining erlotinib response and demonstrated that lung cancer cell lines characterized by increased pEGFR/pAKT ratios are more resistant to erlotinib. The aim of this study was to compare the activation of signal transduction markers in the EGFR pathway between immortalized cell lines and primary cultures of patient-derived tumor cells. Predictive potential of pEGFR/pAKT ratios in both immortalized cell lines and primary cultures of lung cancer cells was also compared.
Methods: Western blotting and In-Cell western analysis were used to determine the activation state of the EGFR signaling pathway. Signaling pathway components were compared in the presence and absence of erlotinib treatment in immortalized lung cancer cell lines and primary cultures of lung cancer specimens. Chemosensitivity of cell lines and specimens to erlotinib was determined using an in vitro drug response marker. Cells were treated with a 10 dose concentration range of erlotinib for 72 hours and the remaining post-treatment live cells were enumerated by nuclear staining.
Results: The pEGFR/pAKT ratio was increased in erlotinib-responsive immortalized cell lines when compared to non-responsive cell lines (p<0.05). This difference in pEGFR/pAKT ratio was significant after treatment with erlotinib as well. The difference in pEGFR/pAKT ratios in response to erlotinib treatment between erlotinib-responsive and non-responsive primary cultures of lung cancer cells was not, however, statistically significant.
Conclusion: These studies confirmed that pEGFR/pAKT ratios may be indicative of erlotinib response in immortalized lung cancer cell lines. However, when evaluating the signal transduction markers in patient-derived primary cultures, no correlation with in vitro erlotinib response was found. These results highlight the value of using in vitro drug response markers, which utilize primary patient tissue, in the development of predictive biomarkers.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
